When it comes to construction projects in Texas, selecting the right construction delivery method is crucial for ensuring project success, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. The choice of construction delivery method depends on whether the client is a public or private entity and whether the project is funded with public or private money. Texas procurement laws allow for various construction delivery methods to be used by public entities. This blog highlights the most popular methods utilized in the regions we work in, their features, and how they can benefit projects managed by JACOB | MARTIN.
Key Construction Delivery Methods
1.Design/Bid/Build – Competitive Bidding
-
- Overview: The traditional method where JACOB | MARTIN is hired by a client to provide design, bidding, and construction management services. During the bidding phase, the client selects and awards construction contracts to the lowest responsible bidder.
- Advantages:
- Transparency: Ensures an open and fair selection process, fostering trust among stakeholders.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Focuses on achieving the lowest cost, making it ideal for projects with tight budgets.
- Simplicity: Straightforward implementation with clear guidelines for bidding and evaluation.
- Disadvantages:
- Limited Quality Considerations: Focus on low cost may overlook contractor quality and qualifications.
- Change Order Risks: Projects with unclear scopes may face significant cost increases due to change orders.
- Limited Collaboration: This method has a shorter timeframe of bidding, usually 2-4 weeks. Therefore, interaction between owner, designer, and contractor during the bidding process is limited in order to maintain fairness to all prospective bidders.
- Ideal For: Projects with clearly defined scopes and minimal risk of changes during construction.
2. Design/Bid/Build – Competitive Sealed Proposals (CSP)
- Overview: Like Competitive Bidding, our clients hire JACOB | MARTIN to design, bid, and manage construction for their project. CSP differs from Competitive Bidding in that it combines price considerations with the evaluation of other factors, such as length of construction, contractor qualifications, familiarity with the region and/or client, and past performance.
- Advantages:
- Balanced Approach: Allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of contractors based on quality, experience, and cost.
- Flexibility: Enables adjustments to project requirements and timelines during the proposal evaluation process. This can sometimes be referred to as “value-engineering”. This method provides better cost transparency than Competitive Bidding but not as much as the CMAR method.
- Quality Assurance: Encourages participation from high-quality contractors who may not be the lowest bidders.
- Disadvantages:
- Complex Evaluation: Requires additional time, effort and expertise to assess and compare proposals effectively. The evaluation process typically can take a couple days up to a week, depending on the client’s familiarity with the contractors.
- Potential for Higher Costs: This method could result in higher overall project costs compared to competitive bidding depending on how the selection criteria is written.
- Potential for Subjectivity: Scoring and evaluation can introduce subjective elements into the selection process.
- Ideal For: Projects where factors other than price significantly impact project success.
-
- 3. Construction Manager-at-Risk (CMAR)
- Overview: This method does not wait for the design to be completed before a contractor is selected. Instead, JACOB | MARTIN assists with the procurement of a CMAR during the design phase to collaborate with the project team during design and manage construction. The CMAR guarantees the maximum price for the project.
- Advantages:
- Early Collaboration: Promotes communication between designers and contractors from the outset, improving design feasibility.
- Cost Control: The CMAR provides cost estimates at the completion of each design phase. This allows the design team, contractor, and client the ability to make changes ahead of construction, saving time and money. The CMAR guarantees a maximum price, reducing the risk of budget overruns.
- Risk Mitigation: Shifts construction-related risks to the construction manager, providing the owner with greater peace of mind.
- Efficiency: Allows for concurrent design and pre-construction planning, expediting project delivery.
- Disadvantages:
- Appearance of Limited Competition: The selection process may reduce competition at the general contractor level. However, it is our experience that the selected CMAR will competitively bid the project as the subcontractors are selected. As a result, this method often yields the best overall value for our clients.
- Complex Management: Requires strong coordination and oversight to ensure alignment between design and construction phases.
- Ideal For: Complex projects with a non-flexible funding source such as a school bond or federal grant where accurate cost estimating by the CMAR is beneficial in evaluating design decisions during the design phases.
- 3. Construction Manager-at-Risk (CMAR)
4. Design-Build
-
-
-
- Overview: Combines design and construction into a single contract, with one entity handling both aspects.
- Advantages:
- Streamlined Communication: Facilitates direct coordination between designers and builders, reducing misunderstandings and conflicts.
- Accountability: Places full responsibility on a single entity, simplifying oversight and ensuring cohesive project management.
- Disadvantages:
- Reduced Owner Control: Consolidating design and construction can limit the owner’s input during the design phase.
- Risk of Design Quality: The focus on efficiency may sometimes compromise design quality.
- Complex Contract Management: Requires carefully crafted contracts to balance the interests of all parties.
- Ideal For: Projects benefiting from a unified approach.
-
-
Selecting the Right Method
The selection of a construction delivery method depends on several factors, including project complexity, timeline, budget sensitivity and risk management. Every project is unique and should be evaluated for the best construction delivery method.
Best Practices for Successful Delivery
At JACOB | MARTIN, we emphasize the importance of:
- Conducting a thorough needs assessment to determine the most suitable delivery method.
- Evaluating the project’s scope, complexity, and risks.
- Leveraging our team’s expertise to guide clients in method selection and implementation.
- Maintaining transparency and accountability throughout the process.
Why Choose JACOB | MARTIN as Your Trusted Partner?
As a leading architecture and engineering firm, JACOB | MARTIN has decades of experience assisting clients with selecting and implementing the most effective construction delivery methods for their projects. Here’s how we stand out as your trusted partner:
- Expert Guidance: Our team of seasoned professionals brings unparalleled expertise to the table, ensuring that every aspect of the delivery method aligns with your project goals and requirements.
- Tailored Recommendations: We take the time to understand the unique challenges and opportunities of your project, offering customized advice to maximize efficiency and cost savings.
- Integrated Approach: From design to construction management, we provide seamless support throughout the entire project lifecycle, making us a one-stop solution for public entities and private clients.
- Proven Track Record: Our extensive portfolio of successful projects showcases our commitment to excellence and our ability to deliver results that exceed client expectations.
- Client-Centered Focus: At JACOB | MARTIN, your success is our priority. We maintain open communication, transparency, and accountability to build lasting partnerships founded on trust and collaboration.
By understanding popular construction delivery methods and aligning them with project goals, public entities and clients of JACOB | MARTIN can achieve optimal outcomes in terms of quality, cost, and efficiency. Whether you’re managing a straightforward project or a complex initiative, our team is here to help you navigate the options and ensure success. Let JACOB | MARTIN be your trusted partner in turning vision into reality.